ATHLON XP V Pentium 4   Term Paper ID:33561 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Compares the Athlon XP architecture with the Pentium 4 architecture for PCs.... More...

5 Pages / 1125 Words 3 sources, 6 Citations, MLA Format $20.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Compares the Athlon XP architecture with the Pentium 4 architecture for PCs. Advantages of each. The long term and significant ramifications of the choice of a system. Concludes the differences between the Athlon XP and the Pentium 4 depends on the application being run. Paper Introduction: Athlon XP v Pentium Introduction Choosing an architecture for computers is not a glamorous decision but the choice can have long-term and significant ramifications fordecision makers For many the choice is little more than Apple v PC although the issue of Linux v Windows is gaining increased visibility However once the choice has been made to use a PC rather than an Apple there are still several architecture choices that must be made AMD andIntel are the two giants in this industry Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. Intel Pentium 4 2.8 GHZ." digit-life.com. The original Pentium 4 used a .18 micron process, which means thatits smallest part was no wider than .18 microns. This makes the chips betteroptions for the multimedia and gaming environments. Because of the new manufacturing process, however, thechip has 512K cache and was initially available in both 2. "AMD Unveils CPU Roadmap." Microprocessor Report 17(Dec 2 3): 1 -13.Metz, Cade. Athlon XP v. For example, the Pentium 4 outperformed the AthlonXP significantly when transferring data from a VideoCD to MPEG4 usingVirtualDub and DivX codec. The newer chip is also smaller than the original Pentium 4, at 146square millimeters. GHz and 2.2GHz.Cache at this level increases the sequential tasks that can be performed,and is particularly useful for multimedia operations. AMD andIntel are the two giants in this industry, offering the flagship Athlon andPentium processors. AMD was a pioneer in the use of DDR memoryand Intel was relatively slow to adopt this technology. Outlook The tests run by industry analysts suggest what other observers havenoted with other processors: certain machines perform certain tasks well,while other machines are better suited to other tasks. Until Intel introduced this on a later version of thePentium 4, only AMD chips had DDR memory capabilities. The use of DDR memory is particularly important when comparing thePentium 4 with the Athlon XP. The Pentium 4 offered severalnew architectural elements compared to the Pentium III, including a 4 MHzbus, new cache technologies and an update to Intel's SSE instruction setfor multimedia. Initially, analysts were not convinced that the Pentium 4 offeredsignificant advantages over the Pentium III. Until thisinnovation, Pentium 4 machines could only use SDRAM and RDRAM. "AMD Athlon XP 26 + Vs. At this point, the Athlon XP is beingrelegated to the low-end of AMD's processor offerings with the companyfocusing major changes to its production processes on more powerfulprocessors that offer greater performance as well as greater profitpotential (Krewell 12). In specific head-to-head tests, the two chips showed remarkableimprovements over their earlier versions. Bothcompanies have brought different processors to the market with similarprice points and capabilities. Works CitedKrewell, Kevin. When the Pentium 4 is put against the Athlon XP, the results are oftencomparable. Pentium 4 Introduction Choosing an architecture for computers is not a glamorous decision,but the choice can have long-term and significant ramifications fordecision makers. For example, although AMD marketed a1.6GHz Athlon XP, its performance rivaled that of the 2.2GHz Pentium 4 inmany benchmark tests. DDR memory, which stands fordouble data rate. "What's Inside?" PC Magazine 21(Feb 12, 2 2): 1 6-112.Ribnikov, Vladimir and Dmitry Mayorov. However, thePentium 4 continued to undergo modification by Intel so that it grew to bea full GHz faster than the Pentium III within a year while its price camedown considerably (Metz 1 7). As such, the Athlon XP will continue to competeeffectively against the lower-end Intel processors, but is not likely toremain a serious threat to the Pentium line of processors. The analysts also note thatspecific programs will work better on one machine than the other, althoughoverall, they determine that the Pentium 4 is better for multimediaprocessing (Ribnikov & Mayorov 3). However, there are other tests in which the Athlon XP far outperformedthe Pentium 4, including a test using SPECviewperf. Athlon XP Analysis The Athlon XP has slower clock speed than the Pentium 4, but becauseof its unique architecture, including DDR memory, the performance is notnoticeably slower than the Pentium 4. PC,although the issue of Linux v. Pentium 4 Analysis The Pentium 4 is the premium chip offered for Windows PCs by Intel.The Celeron chip is slower and less expensive, and is considered anacceptable trade-off for casual users who need to run basic applicationssuch as word processing or spreadsheets, but who do not need the power orspeed of the more expensive Pentium. Conclusion Competition in the microprocessor industry is intense, and Intel andAMD have demonstrated that they are able to succeed in this market. Intel brought evenfaster--3GHz--versions of the Pentium 4 to market in 2 3 (Metz 1 8). The Athlon XP is used in both traditional desktops as well as inlaptop machines using the Athlon XP-M. For many, the choice is little more than Apple v. The Pentium 4 has an advantage with low-level memoryprocessing, and even clearer advantages when intensive multimediaprocessing is involved. Despite this, AMDput fewer innovations into the Athlon XP and more into other Athlon productlines with the result that it focused nearly exclusively on clock speed forinnovations within the XP line. In general, theAthlon XP has a price advantage over the Pentium 4, but AMD has indicatedto the market through its actions that it is focusing development effortson expanding the Athlon line rather than on significant architecturalimprovements to the XP. Windows is gaining increased visibility.However, once the choice has been made to use a PC rather than an Apple,there are still several architecture choices that must be made. The Pentium 4 also underwent a change in that it uses the 845DDR chipset, which enables the use of DDR memory. AMD has indicated that it ispursuing an expanded line of Athlon systems rather than focusing onenhancing the architecture of the XP beyond clock speed, and Intel islikely to do the same with its Pentium line. The advantage here is thought to be gained fromthe SSE2 instruction set as well as from the chip itself (Ribnikov &Mayorov 3). Both companies also manufacture other processors, butthese are the two powerhouse brands associated with each company. By incorporatingDDR into the Pentium 4, Intel positioned the product to be a directchallenger to the Athlon line, and to offer better price performance thanit was able to do in the past. Here, the Athlon XPclearly outperformed the Pentium 4, and the analysts themselves note thatthe Pentium 4 is not geared for this program. Lower clock speed does not always translate intoslower performance in the AMD environment (Metz 1 8). By 2 4, the Pentium 4 boasted a clock speed of2.8GHz and the Athlon XP had increased to a clock speed of more than2.1GHz. Thisresearch considers the Athlon XP and Pentium 4 processors and whichprocessor is appropriate for today's business environment. In2 2, Intel brought forth a new Pentium 4 that used a .13 micron process.This made it possible for Intel to put more and better transistors onto itsPentium 4 chips and increase the clock speeds. DDR isslightly more expensive than SDRAM, but it is significantly faster. Retrieved from the Internet 12 May 2 4: http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/roundupcpu/pentium4-28- athlonxp-26-mx.html. This led to a chip thatwas 217 square millimeters with 256K cache and a top speed of 2 GHz. Direct Comparison The clock speeds continued to increase on both the Athlon XP and theIntel Pentium 4 machine. The result was that the first Pentium 4s had significantperformance advantages over the Pentium III when used in multimediasettings, their performance advantages over Pentium IIIs in businesssettings with less intensive applications were more esoteric. Traditionally, the Athlon XP hasbeen considered competition to the Intel Celeron and low-end Pentium 4machines, but not as powerful as the Intel Pentium 4 when the latter is runin more powerful environments. Thisgives Intel a competitive edge that it previously did not have when coupledwith the larger cache. In head-to-head tests, the differencesbetween the two machines depends on the type of application being run, andeven on the manufacturer of the application. If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.

Many of our Papers can be Downloaded From This Site!

PLEASE READ THIS, IT IS IMPORTANT!

Office hours are Monday through Friday, from 9 am to 5 pm (PST). You may place orders for custom research over the phone during office hours. E-mail requests can be made to our graduate and undergraduate department any time, and will be reviewed during office hours. You may also contact customer service any time through e-mail, and we will review your message during business hours. A great many papers can be downloaded right from this site, but not all of them. If you would like to know if a particular paper is downloadable, just look in the description for: "Available for Internet Download: Y" or "Available for Internet Download: N" If you wish to purchase a paper which is NOT available for immediate download, you will need to make other shipping arrangements. Also, please be aware that these orders are processed Monday through Friday from 9 am to 5 pm (PST). If you place your order after 4:45pm on Friday, it will not be processed until the following Monday morning. We charge $8 per page for all of our pre-written reports, plus shipping (and tax for California residents). However, the highest cost of any ONE report is $136, or 17 pages. Please, take a moment. Make sure you have chosen the report you want or need BEFORE you complete your order. If you are not sure, allow us to help you. We do not offer refunds or exchanges, so it is important for you to let us answer your questions during office hours. Reports which are e-mailed or downloaded are in Microsoft Word format. We are making more reports available for e-mail delivery faster than we can update our listings. Please call to check on the status of particular reports. There are many other shipping options which are listed on the Checkout page.