GLOBALISM.   Term Paper ID:30552 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Evolvement of the global system.... More...

5 Pages / 1125 Words 6 sources, 4 Citations, MLA Format $20.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Evolvement of the global system. Economic, sociocultural, political and environmental problems of globalism. Purposes of globalism proponents. Issues of political power, economic resources, and Capitalism. Role of the United States as a global power. Benefits of globalism. Changes world is undergoing because of a global economy; decline of national goals. Paper Introduction: Basically, globalists believe that the evolution of the world toward a more interconnected international system politically and economically will prove to be a benefit to all nations, large and small, developed and underdeveloped. The skeptics, on the other hand, argue that there are various and serious problems with such a global system, particularly with regard to the exploitation and abuse of the resources of the underdeveloped nations by the developed nations, in both human and natural terms. The reality is that such a global system is clearly evolving, whether the world of nations wants it to or not, so that the warnings and protests of the skeptics should be heeded, not to stop that inevitable evolution, for it will not be stopped, but so that the world powers can deal with the economic, Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. can apply that lesson to its new role today as sole leader ofglobalistic military adventures. Do they care about theenvironment and the effects of unbridled industry on a global scale, or dothey seek to favor industry;'s expansion no matter the effect on theenvironment? Again, if the U.S. From the perspective of globalists who portrayglobalism as a boon to peace and prosperity, clearly globalism is good.However, do such globalists care about keeping human resources at work forthe good of underdeveloped nations, or do they seek to drain such resourcesfor the good of multinational corporations? It is now engaged on a global waragainst terrorism, cobbling together a very loose coalition in that fight.The globalist might argue that such a unified fight is good for the world,but overthrowing a broken and unpopular government in Afghanistan does notadd up to a coherent or even rational global policy. The globalists believe that the good will outweigh the bad in theglobalistic world. is threatened in these essential ways byglobalism, then obviously weaker and poorer nations are in greater dangerof losing their economic, cultural and other connections. . Globalists want to "control sociocultural change" in accord with whatglobalists want, generally based on political power to control economicresources and processes to advance capitalism and wealth for those verysame globalist leaders. Both the Americans (in Vietnam) and the Soviets (inAfghanistan) learned the limits of their "superpower." Time will tell ifthe U.S. He is deeplyconcerned about what he sees as the decline of national concerns and goals,a concern which is even more crucial in considering the societies andcultures in the much more unstable underdeveloped world. As theUnion of Concerned Scientists write: We must manage resources crucial to human welfare more effectively. Rise to Globalism. Ambrose warnsthat globalism includes the realization that no nation, no matter howpowerful, can control the world as it may have been able to in the past(Ambrose xv). The Cold War which drove American foreign policy is over, but theU.S. . He focuses on the impact of the globaleconomy on the American economy and on American society. The richest, most powerful and most developed nation in theworld, the United States, has shown a steady reluctance to join with othernations in fighting global pollution, particularly the greenhouse effect.Scientific evidence is overwhelming of the existence, growth and dangers ofsuch an effect, but without American cooperation, little will likely bedone to fight it. The worldwide division of labor not only will create vast disparities of wealth within nations but also may reduce the willingness of global winners to do anything to reverse this trend toward inequality---either within the nation or without (Reich 315). Boston: Allyn and Bacon,1997.----------------------- 7 The globalist would argue that the benefits outweigh the problems.Although he does consider both sides, Weinstein seems a general supporterof globalism, championing global communications, for example, which seemsto be a benefit few would question. . In this respect, [the nuclear threat] was the ultimate outcome of the scheming and meddling of politicians that Bernard Mandeville had warned against at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution (Weinstein 383). He asks important questions the nation must ponder ifit is to stay afloat in the economically and culturally in the future: Are we still a society, even if we are no longer an economy? The reality is that such a global system is clearly evolving, whetherthe world of nations wants it to or not, so that the warnings and protestsof the skeptics should be heeded, not to stop that inevitable evolution,for it will not be stopped, but so that the world powers can deal with theeconomic, sociocultural, political and environmental problems of globalismbefore it is too late. . The globalists insuch a scheme are merely new players in the old game of imperialism andcolonialism. Basically, globalists believe that the evolution of the world towarda more interconnected international system politically and economicallywill prove to be a benefit to all nations, large and small, developed andunderdeveloped. However, even in such a case, globalismhas its negative effects, such as when a dominant culture (the U.S.)imports its cultural values into an indigenous culture via such acommunications system and overwhelms that culture to such a degree that itdisappears or becomes Americanized. Mountain View, CA.:Mayfield, 1995. Heargues convincingly that the shared historical, economic and socialconcerns of the nation are disintegrating, and that the result will be afragmented society. remains today the main global power. is threatened by globalism, as Reich believes, then certainly poorerand weaker nations and societies are in severe danger from being swallowedup and drained of resources and independence by globalism. Social and Cultural Change. Works CitedAmbrose, Stephen E. (Reich 9). Timothy Crusius and Carolyn Channell. After all, if theU.S. The skeptics, on the other hand, argue that there arevarious and serious problems with such a global system, particularly withregard to the exploitation and abuse of the resources of the underdevelopednations by the developed nations, in both human and natural terms. Politically and militarily,such globalism is tenuous at best, and could be catastrophic. We must give hugh priority to efficient use of energy, water, and other materials, including expansion of conservation and recycling (Union 21 ). The poor and weak and underdeveloped nations are at the mercyof such powerful globalists. Reich, in The Work of Nations, describes the radicalchanges the nations of the world are undergoing because of the emergingglobal economy and he warns about the dangers they face if they are notvigilant in taking such actions. Are we bound together by something more than the gross national product? Such an ignorant and destructive attitude represents theabsolute worst of globalism, a tendency to favor corporations and theirprofits even at the expense of the very world in which we all live. Ambrose, in Rise to Globalism: American Foreign PolicySince 1938, makes it clear that there are political dangers to globalismjust as there are economic, environmental and cultural dangers. The same self-interest controlling the superpowers'actions in the Cold War control today the actions of globalists, whorepresent not the poor and weak but the rich and strong. Robert B. Reich also makesclear the result for the nation and the world if action is not taken tomeet these challenges imaginatively and forcefully: The direction we are heading is reasonably clear. Or has the idea of the nation-state as a collection of people sharing some responsibility for their mutual well-being become passe? . "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity." TheAims of Argument. 2 8-211.Weinstein, Jay. Weinstein establishes a relatively recent historical context for ananalysis of globalism, writing, with respect to the threat of nuclear warafter World War II: . The Work of Nations. The nuclear showdown represented the latest stage in a cumulative quest to control sociocultural change in accord with what is believed to be necessary, just, or in society's best interests. In fact, if the waragainst terrorism spreads at the behest of the rabid militarists in theBush administration, especially to the Middle East, that coalition willshatter and the outcome could be cataclysmic. Ambrosenotes that the foreign policy of the United States (the single mostimportant force for globalism today) since before World War II and into the199 s has been based on largely irrational factors, rather than on anycoherent vision of global reality or this nation's proper place in thatreality. Stephen E. New York: Vintage, l992.Union of Concerned Scientists. New York: Penguin, 1993.Reich, Robert B. However, as in all cases, it is the powerful entity thatdefines the good and bad. Reich warns that individual societies and the world at large are alsoin danger of being increasingly divided along have/have not lines. If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.

Many of our Papers can be Downloaded From This Site!

PLEASE READ THIS, IT IS IMPORTANT!

Office hours are Monday through Friday, from 9 am to 5 pm (PST). You may place orders for custom research over the phone during office hours. E-mail requests can be made to our graduate and undergraduate department any time, and will be reviewed during office hours. You may also contact customer service any time through e-mail, and we will review your message during business hours. A great many papers can be downloaded right from this site, but not all of them. If you would like to know if a particular paper is downloadable, just look in the description for: "Available for Internet Download: Y" or "Available for Internet Download: N" If you wish to purchase a paper which is NOT available for immediate download, you will need to make other shipping arrangements. Also, please be aware that these orders are processed Monday through Friday from 9 am to 5 pm (PST). If you place your order after 4:45pm on Friday, it will not be processed until the following Monday morning. We charge $8 per page for all of our pre-written reports, plus shipping (and tax for California residents). However, the highest cost of any ONE report is $136, or 17 pages. Please, take a moment. Make sure you have chosen the report you want or need BEFORE you complete your order. If you are not sure, allow us to help you. We do not offer refunds or exchanges, so it is important for you to let us answer your questions during office hours. Reports which are e-mailed or downloaded are in Microsoft Word format. We are making more reports available for e-mail delivery faster than we can update our listings. Please call to check on the status of particular reports. There are many other shipping options which are listed on the Checkout page.