DEFORESTATION OF AMAZON.   Term Paper ID:18121 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Social & geographic background, impact on people & resources, causes, technology's effects.... More...

6 Pages / 1350 Words 7 sources, 12 Citations, TURABIAN Format $24.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Social & geographic background, impact on people & resources, causes, technology's effects. Paper Introduction: The purpose of this paper is to discuss the deforestation of the Amazon. This discussion emphasizes the social and geographic background, the impact of deforestation on the Amazon's people and resources, and the causes as well as some proposed solutions to the problem. In an editorial statement, The Economist magazine noted that the Amazon rain forest in Brazil contains . . . nearly one third of all the world's tropical forest--and a greater variety of plants than any other country. The Amazon has more types of fish than in all the rivers of Europe; the trees are home to more species of bird than in all the forests of North America. Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. Further, as the government sawit, legislation had (theoretically) set aside 1, acres of rain forestfor each Indian in the country; therefore, what was the problem with givingadditional land to the poor, rural families? [12]Ibid.----------------------- 8 To these rural families, the government's offer was a godsend. . . . [11]"Defenders of the Amazon," 1 2. & Cockburn, A., "Defenders of the Amazon," New Statesmanand Society, 2, June 23, 1989, 16-22. [4]Filho, J.M. "Fall of the Rain Forest." Discover 1 (April, l989): 4 .----------------------- [1]Editor, "The month Amazonia burns," The Economist, 312, September 9,l989, 15-18. [8]Waters, T., "Fall of the rain forest," Discover, 1 , April 1989, 4 . The plants of the Amazonhave provided greatly in terms of medicinal compounds, and they areexpected to contribute far more in the future, up to and including thepossibility of life-saving compounds for cancer and/or AIDS.[2] However,perhaps the greatest resource of the Amazon rain forest is its contributionto the world's oxygen supply. & Maranho, A., "Amazonia tries again," World PressReview, 32, May 1985, 32-35; Staff writer, "The world puts the heat onBrazil," World Press Review, 36, May 1989, 38-39; House, R., "Defendingthe Amazon," Maclean's, September 19, 1988, N5. The article in The Economist went on tonote that this attitude on the part of the government of Brazil led tocalls for internationalizing the Amazon: Whether Brazil likes it or not . This discussion emphasizes the social and geographicbackground, the impact of deforestation on the Amazon's people andresources, and the causes as well as some proposed solutions to theproblem. & Cockburn, A. In thisregard, several plans are being considered, the most major of which can bedelineated here. It does not seem unreasonable to state that themost effective plan is going to be the one that all of these groups cansupport and work together with in harmony. . BIBLIOGRAPHYEditor. While this plan sounds good, some people arestrongly against it, noting that any such expenditures would most certainlybe managed by the same people that initiated the forest's destruction.[11] The final point that needs to be noted is that, before any plan toremediate the situation can succeed, it must take into account the diversesocial milieu involved in the situation. [3]Hecht, S. then zones of limited forest exploitation could be established around areas set aside as national parks. As noted in The Economist, from Brasilia's point of view, this musclesmacked of both arrogance and unwarranted alarm.[5] First of all, the rainforest covered more than half of Brazil's land; surely, the government hadsome right to exploit its own resources. For example, it has now been fairly wellestablished that not only were environmental concerns non-alarmist, theymay have actually been underestimates of the damage.[8] Moreover, anincreasing body of environmental data has suggested that Brazil itself maybe at peril if the devastation continues. Focusing mainlyon technological efforts at halting deforestation, this plan calls for"sustainable exploitation" of the trees. Such a move, it was reasoned, would keep these peoplefrom adding to the numbers of extremely poor people already in the cities;in addition, it would give them a chance at a livelihood that could, ifthey worked hard, elevate them from the status of the destitute. [5]"The month Amazonia burns," l5. And, in turn, both the bankers and the church put theircollective muscle on the government of Brazil. The article suggests that,if the plan works, . Forthe Indians and the rubber tappers, the issues are replete with concernsfor their basic survival. In an editorial statement, The Economist magazine noted that theAmazon rain forest in Brazil contains . In addition, the plan specifies that there should beremediation of deforestation from bad fiscal policies such as unprofitablehydro-electric schemes and the unwarranted state funding of iron smeltingplants. Understanding of both the causes of the deforestation and its impactcannot be had without knowledge of the complicated and diverse socialmilieu embroiled in the ongoing battle regarding the Amazon rain forest.In this regard, several articles have attempted to delineate the complexityof this social nexus.[4] These articles indicate that deforestation began,in a major way, with the government of Brazil deciding that its 1 millionpoor, rural families might be given acreage in the Amazon and allowed toengage in farming. . As noted in an article written inThe Nation, each one of the many separate groups involved in stopping thedeforestation has its own distinctly unique views of both the problem andthe solution.[12] With respect to the foregoing, it has been pointed out that for FirstWorld politicians involved in the fight, the problem and the solution arelooked at from the vantage point of whether it will hinder or hurtpolitical aspirations. . Indeed, the rain forest is so massive thatit is estimated that deforestation, which entails burning a conservativeestimate of 28 million acres per year, by itself contributes 2 percent ofthe carbon dioxide in the atmosphereand, as a result, contributes to the warming of world climes, which hascome to be known as the "greenhouse effect."[3] In addition to theforegoing, it can be noted that the Amazon contains the world's richestdeposits of iron ore and other mineral resources. In additionthere is the possibility that large tracts of central and northern Brazilmight one day become desert areas if the deforestation continues. [2]Staff writer, "Hope reaches the Amazon," The Economist, 312, July15, 1989, 47-49. nearly one third of all the world's tropical forest--and a greater variety of plants than any other country. One plan, discussed in The Economist, is basically toconserve the rain forest by having the government concentrate on makingprofits from forest products such as fruit, nuts, and rubber. . The first of these is that data on the global effects ofdeforestation have grown. Theypacked up their families and thei alarms, these regarding the globaleffects of the deforestation, effects relating to the depletion of theworld's oxygen supply and the warming of the atmosphere. . As to the global effects, thegovernment noted that these predictions were based on relatively scant dataand viewed them as exaggerations. & Maranho, A. [7]Ibid. Further, as the government saw it,legislation had (theoretically) set aside 1, acres of rain forest foreach Indian in the country; therefore, what was the problem with givingadditional land to the poor, rural families? "Defending the Amazon." Maclean's 1 1 (September 19, 1989):N5.Staff Writer. From the point of view of the Roman CatholicChurch, the problem and solution is seen in terms of moral and spiritualimperatives with a tendency to turn those on their side into Christ-likefigures and those on the other side into fairly sinister characters. "The World Puts the Heat on Brazil." World Press Review 36 (May l989): 38-39.Waters, T. (and) . The Indians andthe rubber tappers aligned themselves with the power of the CatholicChurch, while the environmentalists put pressure on world bankers lendingmoney to Brazil. "The Month Amazonia Burns." The Economist 312 (September 9,1989): 15-18.Filho, J.M. The buffer zones of commercially productive forest would insulate the parks from illegal wood- cutting and farming by squatters while still provid- ing the people of the region with economic profits.[1 ] A North American plan sometimes called a "debt for nature swap"involves eradicating parts of Brazil's debt to First World countries inreturn for a percentage of the profit Brazil makes being spent onenvironmental projects. As to theis muscle smacked ofboth arrogance and unwarranted alarm.[6] First of all, the rain forestcovered more than half of Brazil's land; surely, the government had someright to exploit its own resources. The medical secrets locked in its plants maycure the sick of many countries; the genes of its wild plants may reinvigorate crops that feed billions of people . . "Amazonia Tries Again." World Press Review32 (May l985): 32-35.Hecht, S. With respect to Brazilian peril, data collected on the deforestationof African jungles indicate that the towns and cities of Brazil which arenear deforested areas are likely to suffer future drought. "Hope Reaches the Amazon." The Economist 312 (July 15, l989): 47-49.Staff Writer. Under this plan, Brazil would be assisted in all efforts by therich industrial countries.[9] Another plan has been discussed in Discover magazine. Possibilities such as the foregoing now have Brasilia seriouslylistening to plans for resolving the deforestation problem. "Defenders of the Amazon." New Statesman andSociety 2 (June 23, l989):16-22.House, R. Implementation of the plan wouldinvolve determining the rate at which trees can be cut down whilemaintaining the forest as a balanced ecosystem. This planalso calls for the identification of new medicines and aromatic oils asforest products. The Amazon has more types of fish than in all the rivers of Europe; the trees are home to more species of bird than in all the forests of North America.[1] The resources of the Amazon do not stop with the tree and animallife, for the plant life must also be included. [1 ]"Fall of the rain forest," 4 . [9]"The month Amazonia burn," 15-16. many people think that atmospheric carbon dioxide is disastrously causing the earth to warm up.[7] Several recent findings have contributed to a softening of Brasilia'sattitude. . [6]"The month Amazonia burns," l5. the rest of the world has a legitimate interest in what happens in Amazonia. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the deforestation of theAmazon. If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.

Many of our Papers can be Downloaded From This Site!

PLEASE READ THIS, IT IS IMPORTANT!

Office hours are Monday through Friday, from 9 am to 5 pm (PST). You may place orders for custom research over the phone during office hours. E-mail requests can be made to our graduate and undergraduate department any time, and will be reviewed during office hours. You may also contact customer service any time through e-mail, and we will review your message during business hours. A great many papers can be downloaded right from this site, but not all of them. If you would like to know if a particular paper is downloadable, just look in the description for: "Available for Internet Download: Y" or "Available for Internet Download: N" If you wish to purchase a paper which is NOT available for immediate download, you will need to make other shipping arrangements. Also, please be aware that these orders are processed Monday through Friday from 9 am to 5 pm (PST). If you place your order after 4:45pm on Friday, it will not be processed until the following Monday morning. We charge $8 per page for all of our pre-written reports, plus shipping (and tax for California residents). However, the highest cost of any ONE report is $136, or 17 pages. Please, take a moment. Make sure you have chosen the report you want or need BEFORE you complete your order. If you are not sure, allow us to help you. We do not offer refunds or exchanges, so it is important for you to let us answer your questions during office hours. Reports which are e-mailed or downloaded are in Microsoft Word format. We are making more reports available for e-mail delivery faster than we can update our listings. Please call to check on the status of particular reports. There are many other shipping options which are listed on the Checkout page.